PDF Print
CATOR partners have been actively collaborating in a number of Research, Development and Knowledge Translation activities since 2001.  These currently ongoing and completed activities related to improving measurement science related to AT outcomes may be found on the following pages.

 

Research and Development

Current Funded Research & Development
Other Current Research & Development
Completed Research & Development

 

Knowledge Translation (Exchange)

CATOR Partner Publications 2001 – 2008
CATOR Partner Presentations 2001 – 2008
Related Publications 2001 – 2008
International Exchange

 

 

Research and Development

 

Return to top

Current Funded Research:

The following work is currently ongoing and supported in part by grant H133A060062 from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. 

This work is being conducted to address the three biggest needs facing AT outcomes researchers, namely: (1) efficient capture of data regarding the impact of AT on activity and participation; (2) efficient, comprehensive capture of data characterizing the nature of AT treatment interventions; and (3) capture of data that reflects the impact of AT on caregivers of those with disabilities.  It is anticipated that by achieving these specific aims, we will substantially improve the quality of AT outcomes research that can be conducted henceforth.

Assistive Technology Outcomes Profile (ATOP/M)
Development of the AT Outcomes Profile (ATOP/M) which is a computer-assisted testing instrument to measure the impacts of mobility-related AT on functioning, health, and subjective well being.  <<link to project update info>>

Assistive Technology Intervention Specification Instrument (AT-ISI)
Development of the AT Intervention Specification Instrument (AT-ISI) for mobility-related devices and classifications of AT devices and services.   <<link to project update info>>

Impact of Assistive Technology on the User-Human Helper Dyad
Development of an instrument to measure the impact of AT on caregivers and to apply the instrument into a single, state-of-the-art study.  <<link to project update info>>

Return to top

 

Other Current Research:
               

 

 

 

Return to top

 

Completed Funded Research:

The following work was supported in part by grant H133A010401 from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.

Bringing conceptual clarity to the field of assistive technology outcomes measurement.
Key findings or discoveries:

  1. Conceptual framework for researching assistive technology (AT) device outcomes. (Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., Scherer, M.J., & DeRuyter, F.:  A framework for the conceptual modeling of assistive technology outcomes.  Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 1243-1251. 2003).
  2. Provisional classification system (taxonomy) for AT device outcomes.  (Jutai, JW., Fuhrer, MJ., Demers, L., Scherer, MJ., & DeRuyter, F.:  Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 84:294-302, 2005).
  3. Framework for modeling the selection of AT devices. (Scherer, M., Jutai, J.W., Fuhrer, M., Demers, L., & DeRuyter, F.:  A Framework for Modelling the Selection of Assistive Technology Devices (ATDs).  Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2(1):1-8, 2007).
  4. Critical review and synthesis on the psychometric and administrative properties of outcome measures used in AT device research. (Lenker, J.A., Scherer, M.J., Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., & DeRuyter, F.:  Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research. Assistive Technology, 17:7-22, 2005).

Barriers and factors contributing to assistive technology abandonment.
Key findings or discoveries:

  1. Development of the concept of mobility devices’ assistive potential and generation of findings establishing the concept’s implications for mobility-device outcomes.
  2. Classification of trajectories of mobility-device use following hospital discharge of medical rehabilitation patients.
  3. Evidence for the validity of activity-related and psychosocial measures in predicting the use and nonuse of mobility-related devices.

Improving Platforms for Acquiring AT Outcomes Data.
Key findings or discoveries:

  1. Development of independent tools for data capture/collection using Palm, tablet PC and Pocket PC platforms.  AT instruments successfully used for proof of concept alternative data capture/collection included AT Satisfaction, Functional AAC Status, PIADS, QUEST, and ADTPA. <<Right click here and select "Save Target As..." to download the sample video>>
  2. Modified commercially available technologies for alternative data capture strategies of AT outcomes data capture/collection.  Successfully demonstrated proof of concept and limited beta-testing with bar coding, digital pen, IR tracking, and RFID. <<link to videos of bar coding, digital pen, IR tracking >>
  3. Developed proof of concept automatic logfile performance data capture strategy using RFID to capture/collect AT outcome data. <<link to static ppt slide >>
  4. Development of real-time web-based data capture/collection and reporting strategy using the AT outcome psychosocial/quality of life measure PIADS.  Successfully demonstrated proof of concept, feasibility, and limited beta-testing. <<link to video>>
  5. Modified real-time web-based data capture/collection and reporting strategy to operate on portable handhelds including Blackberry.  Successfully demonstrated proof of concept, feasibility, and limited beta-testing. <<link to video>>

 

The following work was supported in part by grant # ……………

 

 

Return to top

Knowledge Translation (Exchange)

CATOR’s vision is to develop a systematic, integrated approach to accelerate optimal use of the best available research evidence in the interest of the health and well being of AT users and caregivers.  Using knowledge conceptually, to change understanding or attitude, is quite different from using it instrumentally, to change behavior and practice.  Multifaceted strategies are more likely to be successful than single interventions.  CATOR targets its knowledge translation exchange to both forms of knowledge use. 

 

CATOR Partner Publications 2001 – 2008:
2001

 

2002
  1. Demers, L., Monette, M., Descent, M., Jutai, J., & Wolfson, C.  (2002). The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS): Translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Canadian-French version.  Quality of Life Research, 11, 583-592.
  2. Jutai, J. & Day, H.   (2002). Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS).  Technology & Disability, 14, 107-111. 
  3. DeRuyter, F. and Caves, K. (2002). State of the Science Issues for Communication Enhancement.  In Winters, J., Robinson, C., Simpson, R., and Vanderheiden, G. (Eds): Emerging and Accessible Telecommunications, Information and Healthcare Technologies – Engineering Challenges in Enabling Universal Access.  RESNA-IEEE Press, Arlington, VA
  4. Smith, R.O., Edyburn, D., DeRuyter, F., Jutai, J., Scherer, M., & Andrich, R.  (2002). Assistive technology outcomes: what does it mean to me?  RESNA 2002 Annual Proceedings, RESNA Press, Arlington, VA
  5. Jutai, J.W., DeRuyter, F., & Scherer, M.  Advancing assistive technology outcomes: the Consortium for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research (CATOR). RESNA 2002 Annual Proceedings, RESNA Press, Arlington, VA.

Return to top

2003
  1. Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., Scherer, M.J. & DeRuyter, F.  (2003). A framework for the conceptual modeling of assistive technology device outcomes.  Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(22), 1243-1251.
  2. Teasell, R.W., Jutai, J.W., Bhogal, S.K., & Foley, N.C. (2003).  Research gaps in stroke rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 9(4), 59-70.
  3. Wright, F.V., Hubbard, S., Naumann, S. & Jutai, J.  (2003). Evaluation of the validity of the prosthetic upper extremity functional index for children. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(4), 518-27.
  4. Devitt, R., Chau, B., & Jutai, J.W.  (2003). The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with Multiple Sclerosis.  In: M. Finlayson (Ed.), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research with Persons with Multiple Sclerosis.  New York: Haworth Press, Inc.  pp.63-79.
  5. Jutai, J.W., & Bortolussi, J.A.  (2003).  Psychosocial impact of assistive technology: development of a measure for children.  In: G.M. Craddock, L.P. McCormack, R.B. Reilly, & H.T.P. Knops (Eds.), Assistive technology – shaping the future.  Amsterdam: IOS Press.  pp. 936-940.
  6. Jutai, J. & Saunders, G.  (2003). Psychosocial outcomes of hearing aids.  In: G.M. Craddock, L.P. McCormack, R.B. Reilly, & H.T.P. Knops (Eds.), Assistive technology – shaping the future.  Amsterdam: IOS Press.  pp. 510-514.
  7. Jutai, J., Bayley, M., Teasell, R., & Hartley, M.  (2003). Psychosocial impact of assistive technology devices in stroke.  In: G.M. Craddock, L.P. McCormack, R.B. Reilly, & H.T.P. Knops (Eds.), Assistive technology – shaping the future.  Amsterdam: IOS Press.  pp. 814-818.
  8. Jutai, J., Day, H., Woolrich, W., & Strong, G.  (2003). The predictability of retention and discontinuation of contact lenses.  Optometry, 74, 299-308. 
  9. Jutai, J.W. & Teasell, R.W.  (2003). The necessity and limitations of evidence-based practice in stroke rehabilitation.  Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 10(1), 71-78.
  10. Jutai, J.W., Bhogal, S.K., Foley, N.C., Bayley, M., Teasell, R.W., & Speechley, M.R.  (2003). Treatment of visual perceptual disorders post stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 10, 77-106.
  11. Devitt, R., Chau, B., & Jutai, J.W.  (2003). The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with Multiple Sclerosis.  Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 17, 63-79.
  12. Knox, R., Yokota-Adachi, H., Kershner, J., & Jutai, J.W.  (2003). Musical attention training program and alternating attention in brain injury: an initial report.   Music Therapy Perspectives, 21(2): 99-104.

Return to top

2004
  1. Strong, G., Jutai, J.W., Bevers, P., Hartley, M., & Plotkin, A.  (2004).  The psychosocial impact of closed-circuit television (CCTV) low vision aids.  Visual Impairment Research, 5(3), 179-190.
  2. Teasell, R.W. & Jutai, J.W.  (2004). Rehabilitation in the elderly stroke patient.  Geriatrics and Aging.
  3. Jutai, J.W., Fuhrer, M.J., Scherer, M.J., DeRuyter, F., & Demers, L. (2004). A conceptual foundation for researching assistive technology outcomes. RESNA 2004 Annual Proceedings, RESNA Press, Arlington, VA
  4. DeRuyter, F., Caves, C., Saldana, D., & Jutai, JW.  (2004). Platform Independent and Web-Based AT Outcome Data Collection Tools.  RESNA 2004 Annual Proceedings, RESNA Press, Arlington, VA
  5. Lenker, J.A., Scherer, M.J., Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., & DeRuyter, F. (2004). Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research. RESNA 2004 Annual Proceedings, RESNA Press, Arlington, VA

Return to top

2005
  1. Jutai JW, Fuhrer MJ, Demers L, Scherer MJ, & DeRuyter F.  (2005). Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes.  American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 84(4), 294-302.
  2. Lenker, J.A., Scherer, M.J., Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., & DeRuyter, F.  (2005).  Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research.  Assistive Technology, 17(1), 7-22.
  3. Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, Foley N, Bitensky J, Bayley M .  (2005). Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Activities.  Disability and Rehabilitation. 27(6), 315-340.
  4. Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, Foley N, Bitensky J, Bayley M.  (2005). Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation.  Disability and Rehabilitation.  27(9), 507-528.
  5. Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell, R, Foley N, Bitensky J.  (2005). Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Body Functions.  Disability and Rehabilitation. 27(4), 191-207.
  6. Jutai, J., Strong, G., Ariizumi, H., & Plotkin, A.  (2005). Feasibility of dynamic modeling of outcomes for low vision devices.  Proceedings of the Vision2005 International Conference.  Elsevier.
  7. Teasell R, Salter K, Jutai J, Sangha H.  Commentary:  Time to standardize stroke rehabilitation outcomes?  Is more better?  CAPM&R Newsletter 2005; Winter: 10-12.
  8. Demers, L., Jutai, J.W., Scherer, M., Pervieux, M.Sc., & DeRuyter, F.  (2005).The Challenge of Locomotion Device Tracking in Longitudinal Outcome Studies.  RESNA 2005 Proceedings, RESNA Press, Atlanta, GA
  9. Demers, L, Jutai, JW, Fuhrer, MJ, Scherer, M, & DeRuyter, F. (2005). Outcome areas that matter to users of assistive technology devices.  Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Conference Proceedings, Vancouver BC.
  10. Demers, L., Jutai, J., Fuhrer, M., Scherer, M., Pervieux, I., De Ruyter, F. (2005). Scenarios of locomotion device utilization among community-dwelling older adults. Canadian Association on Gerontology 34th Annual Scientific Meeting Proceedings - Aging Navigating the Winds of Change. Ottawa (On), p. 122.

Return to top

2006
  1. Fuhrer M, Jutai J, Demers L, Scherer M, Bloch E, DeRuyter F.  (2006)  Effects of type of locomotive device and disabling condition on device use and disuse among elderly individuals following hospitalization.  International Conference on Aging, Disability, and Independence Proceedings.  St. Petersburg, FL.
  2. Jutai J, Fuhrer M, DeRuyter F, Demers L, Scherer M.  (2006) Considerations for conceptualizing the study of assistive technology outcomes for persons who are aging with a disability.  International Conference on Aging, Disability, and Independence Proceedings.  St. Petersburg, FL.
  3. DeRuyter F, Jutai J, Saldana D, Bloch E, Ghany N, Caves C.  (2006)  Platform-independent and web-based tools for assistive technology outcomes measurement in the home and community.  International Conference on Aging, Disability, and Independence Proceedings.  St. Petersburg, FL.
  4. DeRuyter F, Saldana D, Jutai J.  (2006). Assistive technology device outcome data collection tools.  RESNA Proceedings, RESNA Press, Arlington, VA.
  5. Scherer, M., Jutai, J., Fuhrer, M., Demers, L. & DeRuyter, F. (2006). Factors impacting consumers’ assistive technology device (ATD) selection.  RESNA Proceedings, RESNA Press, Arlington, VA
  6. Fuhrer M, Jutai J, Scherer M, Demers L, DeRuyter F.  (2006). Predicting the Discontinued Use of Locomotion Assistive Technology Devices:  The Role of Rehabilitation Diagnosis, Device Type, and Unassisted Locomotion Status.  RESNA Proceedings, RESNA Press, Arlington, VA
  7. Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Scherer M, DeRuyter F.  (2006).  Psychosocial impact predicts locomotion assistive technology device outcome.  RESNA Proceedings, RESNA Press, Arlington, VA   
  8. Jutai, JW., Fuhrer, M., Demers, L., Scherer. M., DeRuyter, F.  (2006). Predicting assistive technology device outcomes.  Arch Phys Med Rehabilitation.  87:E3
  9. Demers, L., Jutai, F., Fuhrer, M., Scherer, M., Pervieux, I., DeRuyter, F (2006). Trajectoires d’utilisation d’aides techniques à la mobilité suite au congé de réadaptation. Canadian Journal on Aging, 25, 164.
  10. Auger, C. & Demers, L. (2006). Workshop on assistive devices outcome measurement. Proceedings of the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists National Conference, Evidence and occupation: Building the future, Montréal (Qc).

Return to top

2007
  1. Scherer, M., Jutai, J., Fuhrer, M., Demers, L., & DeRuyter, F. (2007). A framework for modeling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2(1), 1-8.
    Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Lenker JA, DeRuyter F. (2007). A framework for evaluating assistive technology outcomes on the user-caregiver dyad. Proceedings Festival of International Conferences on Caregiving, Disability, Aging and Technology (FICCDAT). 2007 CD-ROM: FICCDAT.
  2. Demers, L., Fuhrer, M., Jutai, J., Scherer, M., Pervieux, I., & DeRuyter, F. (2007). Tracking mobility-related assistive technology in an outcomes study. Proceedings Festival of International Conferences on Caregiving, Disability, Aging and Technology (FICCDAT). 2007 CD-ROM: FICCDAT.
  3. Auger, C., Demers, L., & Gélinas, I. (2007). What do we know about the outcomes of powered wheelchairs for senior use?.In x (Ed.), x (pp. x). x: x.
  4. Demers, L., Jutai, JW., Fuhrer, MJ., Lenker, JA., & DeRuyter, F. (2007). Advancing assistive technology outcomes research in aging. Proceedings Festival of International Conferences on Caregiving, Disability, Aging and Technology (FICCDAT). CD-ROM: FICCDAT.

 

Return to top

 


CATOR Partner Presentations 2001 – 2008:
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008

 

Return to top

Related Publications 2001 – 2008:
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008

 

Return to top

International Exchange

CATOR principals provided leadership for establishing the International Network of Collaborators in Assistive Technology Outcomes Research (INCATOR).  Its membership includes representatives from international associations for advancing AT outcomes (RESNA, RESIA, AAATE).  The mission of INCATOR is to establish international guidelines and standards for the translation and validation of AT outcome measures as well as to develop a core set of international outcome measures for AT.  Represented countries and other entities currently active in translation projects include Canada, Israel, Italy, Korea, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and the United States. <<link to project update info>>

 

Return to top
 
[ Back ]

 

 
© 2008 Consortium for Assistive Technologies Outcomes Research   |   Site by Netpore